Bentham Everywhere

Estimated Reading Time: 8 Minutes



In the fading light of a city that never sleeps, the shadows whisper of a notion we clung to like a lifeline: autonomy. For Foucault, it is a myth we believe in, an illusion we chase as we wander through dimly-lit streets, as if we could forge our own paths. Our lives, he ruminates, are mere reflections in the murky waters of a greater force that continues to infiltrate our imaginations while we sleep and which defines our desires in waking.

The omnipresent force, he shares, is not merely a labyrinth of laws and institutions we abide. This is the cosmopolitan pulse that courses through the veins of society--the invisible hand that guides our thoughts, our memories, and our souls. This dictates normalcy and governs our interactions, as though it is a silent puppeteer pulling its strings.

Like an insidious warden, what he calls the Panopticon scrutinizes and corrects, snuffing out the flames the moment an idea or action deviates from its paradigms. When the Panopticon could not eliminate, it appropriates, swallowing us whole into its gaping maw. It is a prison that demands conformity, hiding behind a façade of freedom and justice, crushing those who dared to defy its tyranny.





Glorify the architectural marvel that the Panopticon is: a towering central structure encircled by a ring of minuscule cells, separated by walls that ensure the seclusion of each individual inmate. This ingenious design allows the observer, perched within the central nucleus, to clandestinely surveil any cell at will. Meanwhile, the prisoners, sequestered within their isolated compartments, remain oblivious to their surroundings, save for the omnipresent, all-seeing tower. A masterful blend of optics and geometry conjures an illusion so potent that none of the prisoners can discern whether they are under watchful eyes, leaving them to languish in a perpetual state of vigilance and self-restraint, plagued by the dread of retribution. The peculiarities of the Panopticon's design render the prisoners incapable of interaction with their fellow captives. In this cold edifice, a prisoner is reduced to a mere object of surveillance – forever observed, but never an observer. It is the ultimate example of architectural efficiency, designed to maximize control.

Foucault's keen scrutiny unveils the far-reaching tendrils of this model of social control, stretching beyond prison walls and infiltrating other bastions of society, such as our schools and our workplaces. As we traverse a world where surveillance has become omnipresent, it is vital that we acknowledge the insidious nature of this encroaching form of domination and stand steadfast in safeguarding our rights to privacy and self-determination. Only then, when we understand the full weight of this meta-structure, can we break free from its grasp and dignify our autonomies as more than just whispered dreams in the shadows of a city that never sleeps.

. . .



The parallels between Bentham's Panopticon and the effects of modern public surveillance technology are well-documented. Yet, to truly fathom the depth and repercussions of Bentham's brainchild on the human psyche, we must venture back to Plato's Allegory of the Cave. It is within this narrative that the true essence of Bentham's undertaking resides.





In the realm of perception, the caves of Plato and Bentham's Panopticon share an intriguing connection, though they manifest in disparate ways and pursue contrasting aims.  Plato's allegory of the cave serves to highlight how profound human blindness is, a fundamental distortion of reality that can only be surpassed through enlightenment and the pursuit of truth. Conversely, Bentham's Panopticon is less concerned with spiritual illumination and more attentive with crafting an impeccably calibrated system of societal order and discipline to maximize communal welfare and satisfaction. While Plato sought to elevate consciousness and liberate individuals from the shackles of ignorance, Bentham aspired to engineer a failsafe apparatus of social control, ensuring the best outcomes for greater society, or so he thought.



Remarkably, despite their philosophical differences, Bentham and Plato converged on a strikingly similar authoritarian vision of society. Plato's Theory of Forms, revered for its social ambitions, aimed to establish a ruling class of philosopher-kings. In contrast, Bentham's seemingly democratic Panopticon would ultimately lead towards a totalitarian regime. Through exclusion and stratification, the Panopticon weaves a ubiquitous structure that tinges our collective perception and constrains individuals to preordained roles within the social order. It is a contemporary incarnation of the caves of Plato, and those within it are there willingly. 



Thus, just as the universe is perceived as a grand image, from which all existence stems, surveillance technologies that is the backdrop of social media networks, in the same way, hold deliberative sway to our thoughts, conduct, and views. The Panopticon epitomizes total surrender to the unspoken undercurrents of power. Perhaps Bentham and Plato harbor more common ground in their conceptions of an ideal society than previously acknowledged.



. . .



In the twilight of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, we find ourselves teetering on the edge of an expansive precipice, an urgent call to elevate the collective consciousness of humanity. Among many things that necessitate reform, a robust and comprehensive digital and media agenda for algorithmic justice becomes indispensable, seamlessly woven into the very fabric of our educational institutions across all levels. This beckoning transformation seeks to restrain the unscrupulous exploitation of our innate longing for connection, a delicate dance masterfully orchestrated by companies that mine our data and manipulate our behavior through surveillance in infinite scroll and insistent notifications.



As the world turns, and uncharted frontiers unfurl before us, it becomes essential we must adapt our policies to these shifting sands beneath our feet, lest we falter and stumble. Through the subtle alchemy of education, we may temper our insatiable appetites, diminish the addictive grip of social networking services, and stem the deluge threatening to engulf our collective attention economy. The ultimate reward lies in a society adept at navigating the digital cosmos with purposeful awareness, engaging with the abundance of social network landscapes in ways that are both nourishing and sustainable.  This awareness, once kindled, will fuel the embers of a burgeoning social movement, demanding for more humane technologies that have since been tantalizingly out of reach as profit is put first before people.



For Millennials, Generation Z, and the legions of future generations who are yet to walk this world, the stakes are critical. A planet yearning for restoration from the precarious state of the world we find ourselves now cannot be left in the hands of those ensnared by the siren song of distraction and discreet data exploitation.